Uploaded image for project: 'Derby'
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-5548

Implement a GRANT/REVOKE scheme for authorizing system-wide operations

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: SQL
    • Urgency:
      Normal
    • Bug behavior facts:
      Security

      Description

      This is an alternative proposal for how we could authorize system-wide operations. Those operations are:

      o Database creation
      o Database restoration
      o Engine shutdown
      o Server shutdown
      o Server startup

      Currently, any valid Derby user can execute all of those operations. This leaves Derby-powered applications vulnerable to resource-exhaustion and denial-of-service attacks. There is no reason that a data-entry clerk should have the power to bring down an enterprise-wide application.

      DERBY-2109 describes our first attempt to implement authorization for system-wide operations. The work on that issue was never completed. Under the DERBY-2109 scheme, system-wide operations are authorized by entries in the application's Java security policy. That scheme has some shortcomings:

      1) Configuring Java security policy files is tricky. It is easy to make mistakes. Furthermore, the policy file reader does not give you much assistance in tracking down and correcting those mistakes.

      2) The scheme only grants privileges to individual users. You can't grant system-wide privileges to roles.

      The following alternative scheme builds on the idea of a Credentials DB, introduced by the work on DERBY-866. Thanks to Dag for helping puzzle through these issues.

      -------------------------------------------------

      A system-wide Credentials DB could be used to store system-wide privileges in addition to system-wide credentials. 2 variants of this proposal have been considered:

      i) We could introduce some new privileges, extensions to the SQL Standard privilege set. The DBO of the Credentials DB could grant and revoke these privileges to/from users/roles:

      DERBY_CREATE_DATABASE
      DERBY_RESTORE_DATABASE
      DERBY_SHUTDOWN_ENGINE
      DERBY_SHUTDOWN_SERVER
      DERBY_STARTUP_SERVER

      ii) Alternatively, we could introduce some new system routines to represent the system-wide operations. Privilege to perform the operations would depend on whether a user/role had been granted EXECUTE privilege on the corresponding routines:

      syscs_util.syscs_create_database()
      syscs_util.syscs_restore_database()
      syscs_util.syscs_shutdown_engine()
      syscs_util.syscs_shutdown_server()
      syscs_util.syscs_startup_server()

      A new Derby property would configure whether this authorization scheme should be used. This property would be set at the system level, that is, on the JVM properties or in derby.properties:

      -Dderby.system.authorization=NATIVE

      If we implemented this scheme in the 10.9 timeframe, then we could default it to being on whenever NATIVE authentication was on at the system level. For instance, for an application with one database, myDB, NATIVE authentication and authorization would both be switched on by setting one knob:

      -Dderby.authentication.provider=NATIVE:myDB

      We could also introduce a new attribute on the connection URL:

      role=roleName

      Here for instance would be the processing flow when a user tried to connect with the following URL:

      jdbc:derby:;shutdown=true;user=alice;password=alicepassword;role=sysadmin

      a) A connection would be opened to the Credentials DB using alice's credentials.

      b) On that connection, an attempt would be made to "set role sysadmin". If that failed, the shutdown would error out.

      c) If the role change succeeded, Derby would verify whether alice or the sysadmin role had been granted privilege to shutdown the engine. If not, the shutdown would error out.

      d) If the privilege had been granted, then orderly shutdown would be performed.

      It should be possible to make this authorization scheme work regardless of the authentication scheme being used. That is, it could work regardless of whether you were using LDAP, custom, or NATIVE authentication.

      A key advantage of this scheme is that it would be easy to administer using familiar GRANT/REVOKE commands.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                rhillegas Richard N. Hillegas
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated: