Derby
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-47

Some possible improvements to IN optimization

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 10.0.2.0
    • Fix Version/s: 10.3.1.4
    • Component/s: SQL
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      all

      Description

      Consider a simple case of -
      A table tbl has 10000 rows, there is a primary key index on i1
      and the query in question is
      select * from tbl where i1 in (-1,100000)

      derby does a table scan of the entire table even though the "IN" list has only two values and the comparison is on a field that has an index.

      Briefly looking at the code, it seems like we insert a between and use the IN list to get the start and stop values for the scan. Thus the range of the values in the "IN" list here plays an important role.

      Thus if the query was changed to select * from tbl where i1 in (-1, 1), an index scan would be chosen.

      It would be nice if we could do something clever in this case where there is clearly an index on the field and the number of values in the IN list is known. Maybe use the rowcount estimate and the IN list size to do some optimizations.

      • consider the length of the "IN" list to do searches on the table. ie use the IN list values to do index key searches on the table,
        -or try to convert it to a join. Use the "IN" list values to create a temporary table and do a join. It is most likely that the optimizer will choose the table with "IN" list here as the outer table in the join and thus will do key searches on the larger table.

      -------------------------------------------------------------------
      some query plans that I logged using derby.language.logQueryPlan=true for some similar queries:

      Table has ascending values from 0 - 9999 for i1. primary key index on i1.

      GMT Thread[UT0,5,main] (XID = 19941), (SESSIONID = 0), select * from scanfixed where i1 in (-1,9999,9998,9997,9996,9995,9994,9993,9992,9991,9990) ******* Project-Restrict ResultSet (2):
      Number of opens = 1
      Rows seen = 10000
      Rows filtered = 9990
      restriction = true
      projection = false
      constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
      open time (milliseconds) = 0
      next time (milliseconds) = 0
      close time (milliseconds) = 0
      restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
      projection time (milliseconds) = 0
      optimizer estimated row count: 750.38
      optimizer estimated cost: 8579.46

      Source result set:
      Table Scan ResultSet for SCANFIXED at read committed isolation level using instantaneous share row locking chosen by the optimizer
      Number of opens = 1
      Rows seen = 10000
      Rows filtered = 0
      Fetch Size = 16
      constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
      open time (milliseconds) = 0
      next time (milliseconds) = 0
      close time (milliseconds) = 0
      next time in milliseconds/row = 0

      scan information:
      Bit set of columns fetched=All
      Number of columns fetched=9
      Number of pages visited=417
      Number of rows qualified=10000
      Number of rows visited=10000
      Scan type=heap
      start position:
      null stop position:
      null qualifiers:
      Column[0][0] Id: 0
      Operator: <=
      Ordered nulls: false
      Unknown return value: false
      Negate comparison result: false
      Column[0][1] Id: 0
      Operator: <
      Ordered nulls: false
      Unknown return value: true
      Negate comparison result: true

      optimizer estimated row count: 750.38
      optimizer estimated cost: 8579.46

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      l
      2004-10-14 18:59:47.577 GMT Thread[UT0,5,main] (XID = 19216), (SESSIONID = 0), select * from scanfixed where i1 in (9999,9998,9997,9996,9995,9994,9993,9992,9991,9990) ******* Project-Restrict ResultSet (3):
      Number of opens = 1
      Rows seen = 10
      Rows filtered = 0
      restriction = true
      projection = true
      constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
      open time (milliseconds) = 0
      next time (milliseconds) = 0
      close time (milliseconds) = 0
      restriction time (milliseconds) = 0
      projection time (milliseconds) = 0
      optimizer estimated row count: 4.80
      optimizer estimated cost: 39.53

      Source result set:
      Index Row to Base Row ResultSet for SCANFIXED:
      Number of opens = 1
      Rows seen = 10
      Columns accessed from heap =

      {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}

      constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
      open time (milliseconds) = 0
      next time (milliseconds) = 0
      close time (milliseconds) = 0
      optimizer estimated row count: 4.80
      optimizer estimated cost: 39.53

      Index Scan ResultSet for SCANFIXED using index SCANFIXEDX at read committed isolation level using instantaneous share row locking chosen by the optimizer
      Number of opens = 1
      Rows seen = 10
      Rows filtered = 0
      Fetch Size = 16
      constructor time (milliseconds) = 0
      open time (milliseconds) = 0
      next time (milliseconds) = 0
      close time (milliseconds) = 0
      next time in milliseconds/row = 0

      scan information:
      Bit set of columns fetched=All
      Number of columns fetched=2
      Number of deleted rows visited=0
      Number of pages visited=2
      Number of rows qualified=10
      Number of rows visited=10
      Scan type=btree
      Tree height=2
      start position:
      >= on first 1 column(s).
      Ordered null semantics on the following columns:

      stop position:
      > on first 1 column(s).
      Ordered null semantics on the following columns:

      qualifiers:
      None
      optimizer estimated row count: 4.80
      optimizer estimated cost: 39.53

      1. d47_beforeAndAfter.html
        112 kB
        A B
      2. d47_beforeAndAfter.html
        112 kB
        A B
      3. d47_mp_junitTest_v1.patch
        32 kB
        A B
      4. d47_mp_cleanup_v1.stat
        0.6 kB
        A B
      5. d47_mp_cleanup_v1.patch
        17 kB
        A B
      6. d47_mp_preprocess_v2.patch
        20 kB
        A B
      7. Derby47PerformanceTest.java
        38 kB
        James Synge
      8. readlocks_withContext.diff
        34 kB
        A B
      9. d47_mp_preprocess_v1.stat
        0.8 kB
        A B
      10. d47_mp_masters_v1.patch
        59 kB
        A B
      11. d47_mp_preprocess_v1.patch
        18 kB
        A B
      12. d47_mp_exec_v1.stat
        0.4 kB
        A B
      13. d47_mp_exec_v1.patch
        23 kB
        A B
      14. d47_mp_codeGen_v1.stat
        0.9 kB
        A B
      15. d47_mp_codeGen_v1.patch
        28 kB
        A B
      16. d47_mp_addlTestCases.patch
        37 kB
        A B
      17. d47_mp_CBO_MoAP_v1.stat
        0.2 kB
        A B
      18. d47_mp_CBO_MoAP_v1.patch
        10 kB
        A B
      19. d47_mp_relOpPredCheck_v1.stat
        0.2 kB
        A B
      20. d47_mp_relOpPredCheck_v1.patch
        9 kB
        A B
      21. readlocks_withContext.diff
        43 kB
        A B
      22. readlocks.diff
        15 kB
        A B
      23. d47_engine_doNotCommit_v1.stat
        2 kB
        A B
      24. d47_engine_doNotCommit_v1.patch
        68 kB
        A B
      25. InListOperatorNode.java
        24 kB
        James Synge
      26. Derby47PerformanceTest.java
        38 kB
        James Synge
      27. derby-47-performance-data.txt
        4 kB
        James Synge
      28. derby-47-performance-data.txt
        4 kB
        James Synge
      29. Derby47PerformanceTest.java
        32 kB
        James Synge
      30. QueryPlanUniqueIndexOnlyTwoTerms.txt
        3 kB
        Kevin Hore
      31. QueryPlanUniqueIndexOnlyOneTerm.txt
        3 kB
        Kevin Hore
      32. QueryPlanUniqueIndexAndWordIndexTwoTerms.txt
        4 kB
        Kevin Hore
      33. QueryPlanUniqueIndexAndWordIndexOneTerm.txt
        3 kB
        Kevin Hore

        Issue Links

        There are no Sub-Tasks for this issue.

          Activity

          No work has yet been logged on this issue.

            People

            • Assignee:
              A B
              Reporter:
              Sunitha Kambhampati
            • Votes:
              8 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development