Derby
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-3263

derbynet/testconnection.java failed on AIX5.2 with bothe ibm142 and ibm15 jdks

    Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 10.3.2.1
    • Fix Version/s: 10.4.1.3
    • Component/s: Test
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:
      IBM15 (SR6) and ibm142(SR9)

      Description

      Here is the diff. Looks like it is a master issue

          • Start: testconnection jdk1.4.2 DerbyNetClient derbynetmats:derbynetmats 2007
            -12-03 15:53:37 ***
            13 del
            < Could not connect to Derby Network Server on host xxxFILTERED_HOSTNAMExxx - po
            rt 9393: Connection refused ...
            13a13
            > Could not connect to Derby Network Server on host xxxFILTERED_HOSTNAMExxx, por
            t 9393: A remote host refused an attempted connect operation.
            17 del
            < Could not connect to Derby Network Server on host xxxFILTERED_HOSTNAMExxx - po
            rt 9393: Connection refused ...
            17a17
            > Could not connect to Derby Network Server on host xxxFILTERED_HOSTNAMExxx, por
            t 9393: A remote host refused an attempted connect operation.
            Test Failed.
          • End: testconnection jdk1.4.2 DerbyNetClient derbynetmats:derbynetmats 2007
            -12-03 15:54:42 ***

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Myrna van Lunteren added a comment -

          I believe this is no longer an issue, since testconnection.java was converted to junit (see DERBY-3273) and is no longer dependent on this jvm message.

          This can be backported to 10.3 if needed; I assumed it wasn't necessary hence resolving this issue.

          Show
          Myrna van Lunteren added a comment - I believe this is no longer an issue, since testconnection.java was converted to junit (see DERBY-3273 ) and is no longer dependent on this jvm message. This can be backported to 10.3 if needed; I assumed it wasn't necessary hence resolving this issue.

            People

            • Assignee:
              Kathey Marsden
              Reporter:
              Manjula Kutty
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development