Uploaded image for project: 'Derby'
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-24

Client should not be able to raise an event on a PooledConnection it no longer owns.

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 10.0.2.0
    • 10.0.2.0
    • JDBC
    • None

    Description

      Opening this bug on behalf of Daniel Debrunner.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------
      After closing a connection Derby generates a connectionErrorOccurred() event on the PooledConnection when a createStatement() call is made against the closed Connection.

      The code gets a Connection from the PooledConnection, creates a
      Statement, and then closes the Connection. This causes a
      connectionClose() event, like it's supposed to. Then it closes
      it again, which does not raise an exception (the spec doesn't
      really say what should happen if you close it twice, so it's
      hard to claim this is an error...). A second connectionClose()
      event is not generated, which is fine.

      The testcase then calls createStatement() again on the closed
      Connection. This generates a connectionErrorOccurred() event
      on the PooledConnection, which seems wrong. The connection
      pool code at this point is going to figure that the
      PooledConnection is bad and needs to be discarded, even though
      it's fine. (The second createStatement() call receives a
      SQLException, which is fine.)

      The code which receives the error event has to assume that the
      event is associated with the current user of the
      PooledConnection. When the first Connection.close() occurs, we
      will move the PooledConnection into the free pool, and then
      assign it to the next Connection requester. If the first
      Connection client erroneously calls createStatement() on their
      closed Connection facade, the Derby Connection facade
      generates that error event which refers to the PooledConnection
      now being used by the second client. But the code will have to
      assume that the second Connection client received an
      unrecoverable error, and that the PooledConnection needs to be
      closed, when in fact the first connection client has made a
      programming error. There's no way for to tell which client
      caused the error.

      The upshot is that any events should be generated after the close event caused by close(), no matter what is done to that closed Connection facade, since the client's not supposed to be using it anymore.

      The reference for connection pooling semantics is:
      http://java.sun.com/products/jdbc/jdbc20.stdext.pdf

      It doesn't explicitly say what should happen if an error occurs
      on a closed Connection, but it seems like the current behavior
      will confuse the connection pool built on top of
      PooledConnection.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            djd Daniel John Debrunner
            ramank Ramandeep Kaur
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: