[CURATOR-317] Deprecation comment suggests code that is not equivalent

• Type: Bug
• Status: Resolved
• Priority: Trivial
• Resolution: Fixed
• Fix Version/s: 2.11.0, 3.2.0
• Component/s: Documentation
• Assignee: Unassigned
• Reporter: Jorge Montero
• Created: 20/Apr/16 14:18
• Updated: 02/Jun/16 21:15
• Resolved: 21/Apr/16 00:37

Description

An old deprecation (from 2012) recommended replacing withProtectedEphemeralSequential() with
withProtection().withMode(CreateMode.PERSISTENT_SEQUENTIAL), which does not do the same thing! Anyone making that replacement will get persistent nodes instead of ephemeral modes, which can cause all kinds of trouble (it definitely did for us!)

It should be replaced with code that actually does the same thing as the old implementation: .withProtection().withMode(CreateMode.EPHEMERAL_SEQUENTIAL)