Uploaded image for project: 'Crunch'
  1. Crunch
  2. CRUNCH-527

Improve distribution of keys when using default (hash-based) partitioning



    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 0.13.0
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:


      The default partitioner used for MR-based pipelines bases itself on the hash code of keys modulo the number of partitions, along the lines of

      int partition = key.hashCode() % numPartitions

      This approach dependent on the lower bits of the hash code being uniformly distributed. If the lower bits of the key hash code is not uniformly distributed, the key space will not be uniformly distributed over the partitions.

      It can be surprisingly easy to get a very poor distribution. For example, if the keys are integer values and are all divisible by 2, then only half of the partitions will receive data (as the hash code of an integer is the integer value itself).

      This can even be a problem in situations where you would really not expect it. For example, taking the byte-array representation of longs for each timestamp of each second over a period of 24 hours (at millisecond granularity) and partitioning it over 50 partitions results in 34 of the 50 partitions not getting any data at all.

      The easiest way to resolve this is to have a custom HashPartitioner that applies a supplementary hash function to the return value of the key's hashCode method. This same approach is taken in java.util.HashMap for the same reason.

      Note that this same approach was proposed in MAPREDUCE-4827, but wasn't committed (mostly) because of backwards compatibility issues (some people may have counted on certain records showing up in a given output file). Seeing as Crunch is a higher abstraction above MR, I assume that we don't need to worry about the backwards compatibility issue as much, but there may be other opinions on this.


        1. CRUNCH-527.patch
          12 kB
          Gabriel Reid



            • Assignee:
              gabriel.reid Gabriel Reid
              gabriel.reid Gabriel Reid
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              4 Start watching this issue


              • Created: