Uploaded image for project: 'Cassandra'
  1. Cassandra
  2. CASSANDRA-5727

Evaluate default LCS sstable size

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Task
    • Status: Resolved
    • Normal
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 1.2.9
    • None

    Description

      What we're not sure about is the effect on compaction efficiency –
      larger files mean that each level contains more data, so reads will
      have to touch less sstables, but we're also compacting less unchanged
      data when we merge forward.

      So the question is, how big can we make the sstables to get the benefits of the
      first effect, before the second effect starts to dominate?

      Attachments

        1. UpdateLatency_vs_LCS.png
          44 kB
          Daniel Meyer
        2. Throughtput_vs_LCS.png
          38 kB
          Daniel Meyer
        3. ReadLatency_vs_LCS.png
          56 kB
          Daniel Meyer
        4. BytesRead_vs_LCS.png
          34 kB
          Daniel Meyer

        Activity

          People

            dmeyer Daniel Meyer
            jbellis Jonathan Ellis
            Daniel Meyer
            Jonathan Ellis
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: