Uploaded image for project: 'Cassandra'
  1. Cassandra
  2. CASSANDRA-13265

Expiration in OutboundTcpConnection can block the reader Thread

Agile BoardAttach filesAttach ScreenshotBulk Copy AttachmentsBulk Move AttachmentsVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskConvert to sub-taskMoveLinkCloneLabelsUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Normal
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 3.0.14, 3.11.0, 4.0-alpha1, 4.0
    • Messaging/Internode
    • None
    • Cassandra 3.0.9
      Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM version 25.112-b15 (Java version 1.8.0_112-b15)
      Linux 3.16

    • Availability - Unavailable
    • Normal

    Description

      I observed that sometimes a single node in a Cassandra cluster fails to communicate to the other nodes. This can happen at any time, during peak load or low load. Restarting that single node from the cluster fixes the issue.

      Before going in to details, I want to state that I have analyzed the situation and am already developing a possible fix. Here is the analysis so far:

      • A Threaddump in this situation showed 324 Threads in the OutboundTcpConnection class that want to lock the backlog queue for doing expiration.
      • A class histogram shows 262508 instances of OutboundTcpConnection$QueuedMessage.

      What is the effect of it? As soon as the Cassandra node has reached a certain amount of queued messages, it starts thrashing itself to death. Each of the Thread fully locks the Queue for reading and writing by calling iterator.next(), making the situation worse and worse.

      • Writing: Only after 262508 locking operation it can progress with actually writing to the Queue.
      • Reading: Is also blocked, as 324 Threads try to do iterator.next(), and fully lock the Queue

      This means: Writing blocks the Queue for reading, and readers might even be starved which makes the situation even worse.


      The setup is:

      • 3-node cluster
      • replication factor 2
      • Consistency LOCAL_ONE
      • No remote DC's
      • high write throughput (100000 INSERT statements per second and more during peak times).

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            cesken Christian Esken Assign to me
            cesken Christian Esken
            Christian Esken
            Ariel Weisberg
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            9 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment