Uploaded image for project: 'Calcite'
  1. Calcite
  2. CALCITE-550

Case-insensitive matching of sub-query columns fails

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 1.0.0-incubating
    • None
    • None

    Description

      Currently, the default LEX in Calcite is LEX.ORACLE, and most unit test cases are using LEX.ORACLE. However, when LEX is set to be MYSQL/SQL_SERVER etc, Calcite would complain "field/column not found error" in subquery, while the MYSQL/SQL_SERVER policy should allow such query.

      For example, given the following query, with LEX.MYSQL.

      select DID 
      from (select deptid as did 
               FROM
                  ( values (1), (2) ) as T1(deptid) 
               ) 
      

      Calcite would raise the following error:

      Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: Internal error: Type 'RecordType(INTEGER did)' has no field ‘DID'
      

      According to LEX.MYSQL, the unquoted sql identifier should remain unchanged, and matched with case-insensitive, hence the query is valid.

       /** Lexical policy similar to MySQL. (To be precise: MySQL on Windows;
         * MySQL on Linux uses case-sensitive matching, like the Linux file system.)
         * The case of identifiers is preserved whether or not they quoted;
         * after which, identifiers are matched case-insensitively.
         * Back-ticks allow identifiers to contain non-alphanumeric characters. */
        MYSQL(Quoting.BACK_TICK, Casing.UNCHANGED, Casing.UNCHANGED, false),
      

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            julianhyde Julian Hyde
            jni Jinfeng Ni
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: