Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
1.0.0-incubating
-
None
-
None
Description
Motivation: Rex is simpler that linq4j.
For instance,
1) Sometimes it is easier to create a ProjectRel rather than lower the expression to low-level linq4j
2) XXXToEnumerableRule are easier to accomplish via TableFunctionScan. This allows to express the call via Rex and skip linq4j completely.
The problem is to pass non-literal java object to enumerable/interpreter conventions.
For enumerable the implementation can use stash. For interpreter it can use the value as is, etc.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
CALCITE-98 API to pass application-specific data through DataContext
- Open
-
CALCITE-506 Update EnumerableRelImplementor.stash so it is suitable for all kinds of classes
- Closed