Uploaded image for project: 'Calcite'
  1. Calcite
  2. CALCITE-2224

WITHIN GROUP clause for aggregate functions

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 1.18.0
    • None
    • None

    Description

      The WITHIN GROUP clause lets aggregate functions operate on a sorted list of rows, rather than the usual unsorted collection. Order only matters for a few aggregate functions, but we should allow it for all.

      Other analytic functions where WITHIN GROUP would have an effect: RANK, PERCENT_RANK, FIRST_VALUE, LAST_VALUE, PERCENTILE_CONT, PERCENTILE_DISC.

      LISTAGG(value [, separator]) is an Oracle function that concatenates strings. E.g.

      SELECT LISTAGG(last_name, '; ')
               WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY hire_date, last_name)
        FROM Emp
      GROUP BY deptno

      STRING_AGG(value [, separator]) is a [Microsoft SQL Server function|] that does something similar.

      GROUP_CONCAT(value [, separator] [ORDER BY expr [, expr]...) is the MySQL equivalent to LISTAGG. Note the optional ORDER BY clause within the parentheses.

      COLLECT(value) is a SQL standard aggregate function that creates multisets. Oracle added a non-standard ORDER BY clause within the parentheses.

      In my opinion, WITHIN GROUP should always be optional. LISTAGG without WITHIN GROUP would produce non-deterministic output (which is OK); other aggregate functions such as MIN and SUM would just ignore WITHIN GROUP.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              julianhyde Julian Hyde
              julianhyde Julian Hyde
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: