Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      When the QJM (HDFS-3077) is backported to branch-2 and that version eventually becomes part of the Bigtop BOM, the 'hdfs-journalnode' package will need to be added to hadoop.spec.

      I've been working with a personal backport of HDFS-3077 to branch-2 and building RPMs, I haven't done anything with the DEB side of things.

      1. BIGTOP-763.patch
        3 kB
        Andrew Purtell
      2. BIGTOP-763.rvs.patch.txt
        6 kB
        Roman Shaposhnik
      3. 0001-BIGTOP-763.-Add-hdfs-journalnode-to-hadoop.spec.patch
        7 kB
        Roman Shaposhnik

        Activity

        Hide
        Konstantin Boudnik added a comment -

        Yup, looks about right.
        +1

        Show
        Konstantin Boudnik added a comment - Yup, looks about right. +1
        Hide
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment -

        Here's the latest patch on top of Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha-SNAPSHOT

        Show
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment - Here's the latest patch on top of Hadoop 2.0.4-alpha-SNAPSHOT
        Hide
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment -

        Indeed! And it is expected to be in Hadoop 2.0.3-beta as far as I can tell. I very much hope that Bigtop 0.6.0 will be based on Hadoop 2.0.3-beta and then we can pull this patch in. Stay tuned!

        Show
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment - Indeed! And it is expected to be in Hadoop 2.0.3-beta as far as I can tell. I very much hope that Bigtop 0.6.0 will be based on Hadoop 2.0.3-beta and then we can pull this patch in. Stay tuned!
        Hide
        Andrew Purtell added a comment -

        The QJM is now in branch-2.

        Show
        Andrew Purtell added a comment - The QJM is now in branch-2.
        Hide
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment -

        Thanks a lot for sharing your patch! Just for completeness' sake I'm attaching a similar patch that I created for CDH4. Lets merge the two patches once the functionality hits the hadoop 2.X code line.

        Show
        Roman Shaposhnik added a comment - Thanks a lot for sharing your patch! Just for completeness' sake I'm attaching a similar patch that I created for CDH4. Lets merge the two patches once the functionality hits the hadoop 2.X code line.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Roman Shaposhnik
            Reporter:
            Andrew Purtell
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development