Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Resolved
-
P4
-
Resolution: Abandoned
-
None
Description
Currently we give arbitrary names to properties which store versions of dependencies instead of standardizing on naming like:
artifactId.version
For many of our artifacts this makes sense. There are a few cases where the artifactId should not be used because we are intending to provide a version lock over a set of related packages such as:
- google client libraries
- slf4j