Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Patch Available
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: 1.4.1
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: python
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to follow.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Eric Evans added a comment -

          make sense to me.

          Show
          Eric Evans added a comment - make sense to me.
          Hide
          Doug Cutting added a comment -

          This should probably implement anonymous SASL, as described in:

          http://avro.apache.org/docs/current/sasl.html#anonymous

          That way we can have a single socket-based client-server format that can gracefully provide authentication and encryption.

          Show
          Doug Cutting added a comment - This should probably implement anonymous SASL, as described in: http://avro.apache.org/docs/current/sasl.html#anonymous That way we can have a single socket-based client-server format that can gracefully provide authentication and encryption.
          Hide
          Eric Evans added a comment -

          No, actually it seems to performs worse, but the same is true with a Java client. I believe AVRO-704 is to blame.

          Show
          Eric Evans added a comment - No, actually it seems to performs worse, but the same is true with a Java client. I believe AVRO-704 is to blame.
          Hide
          Doug Cutting added a comment -

          Looks good. Is performance appreciably better than over HTTP? I'd expect we might see a significant difference with one-way messages.

          To test this we might:
          . extend Python's tool.py to use socket client & server when uri is "avro:"
          . extend Java's RpcSendTool and RpcReceiveTool to use sockets for "avro:" uris
          . change share/test/interop/bin/test_rpc_interop.sh to test using these "avro:" uris

          Show
          Doug Cutting added a comment - Looks good. Is performance appreciably better than over HTTP? I'd expect we might see a significant difference with one-way messages. To test this we might: . extend Python's tool.py to use socket client & server when uri is "avro:" . extend Java's RpcSendTool and RpcReceiveTool to use sockets for "avro:" uris . change share/test/interop/bin/test_rpc_interop.sh to test using these "avro:" uris

            People

            • Assignee:
              Eric Evans
              Reporter:
              Eric Evans
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:

                Development