Description
Hi,
I am seeing lot of InactivityIO exceptions in my broker logs:-
activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 18:56:49,519 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /10.240.170.27:42813 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@8fe952[State = 0, empty queue]
activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 19:06:52,464 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /10.253.127.196:62265 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@1501b4f[State = 0, empty queue]
activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 19:27:37,074 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:52472 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@19e0323[State = 0, empty queue]
activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 23:33:51,632 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:33558 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@168a9ba[State = 0, empty queue]
activemq.log.2012-03-01:2012-03-01 23:33:56,975 | INFO | Transport failed: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too (>30000) long: /149.77.160.18:55158 | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection.Transport | InactivityMonitor Async Task: java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker@116f46b[State = 0, empty queue]
I am trying to reproduce this with the pooled connection factory but this is not consistently reproducible. Can somebody throw light on the exact cause of this. I don't want to use the inactivityMonitor property.
Thanks,
Bhanu