Uploaded image for project: 'ActiveMQ Classic'
  1. ActiveMQ Classic
  2. AMQ-3082

Broker doesn't stop using the activemq script if the JMX port is changed

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • 5.4.1
    • 5.10.0
    • Broker
    • None
    • CentOS 5.4 64 bits

    Description

      I have two activemq instances on the same machine. One running on all the default port settings and the other one on the following ports:

      Changed to the second activemq instance:
      in bin/activemq:
      ACTIVEMQ_SUNJMX_CONTROL="--jmxurl service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1100/jmxrmi"

      in conf/activemq.xml
      <managementContext createConnector="true" connectorPort="1100" jmxDomainName="broker2"/>
      ...
      <transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://0.0.0.0:61617"/>

      in conf/jetty.xml
      <property name="port" value="8162" />

      So when I execute bin/activemq start:
      ...
      INFO | JMX consoles can connect to service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1100/jmxrmi
      INFO | Listening for connections at: tcp://myhostname:61617
      ...

      When I try to stop it, bin/activemq stop:
      ...
      INFO: There are no brokers to stop.
      .
      INFO: Regular shutdown not successful, sending SIGKILL to process with pid '26137'

      I added some logging to the script to discover that it was doing this call:

      /usr/bin/java -Dactivemq.classpath="/home/myuser/activeMQ2/apache-activemq-5.4.1/conf;" -Dactivemq.home="/home/myuser/activeMQ2/apache-activemq-5.4.1" -Dactivemq.base="/home/myuser/activeMQ2/apache-activemq-5.4.1" -jar "/home/myuser/activeMQ2/apache-activemq-5.4.1/bin/run.jar" stop --jmxurl service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://localhost:1100/jmxrmi

      This doesn't seem to find the JMX service in the specified location, even though it is the URL that was printed at start up (See log above).

      All I wanted to have is two instances running on the same box to test a cluster configuration, but starting/stopping them correctly with the scripts seem to be a pain. A simple kill to the process PID works much better.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            davsclaus Claus Ibsen
            iker.jimenez Iker Jimenez
            Votes:
            4 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: