Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Critical
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
2.3.0
-
None
Description
{ "href" : "http://104.196.94.167:8080/api/v1/users/?Users/user_name.matches(.*.*)&fields=*&from=0&page_size=10&_=1443104119309", "itemTotal" : "2", "items" : [ { "href" : "http://104.196.94.167:8080/api/v1/users/admin", "Users" : { "active" : true, "admin" : true, "groups" : [ ], "ldap_user" : false, "user_name" : "admin", "user_type" : "LOCAL" }, "widget_layouts" : [ ], "privileges" : [ { "href" : "http://104.196.94.167:8080/api/v1/users/admin/privileges/1", "PrivilegeInfo" : { "privilege_id" : 1, "user_name" : "admin" } } ] }, { "href" : "http://104.196.94.167:8080/api/v1/users/jwt-user1", "Users" : { "active" : true, "admin" : false, "groups" : [ ], "ldap_user" : false, "user_name" : "jwt-user1", "user_type" : "JWT" }, "widget_layouts" : [ ], "privileges" : [ ] } ] }
We introduce new field "user_type" instead of "ldap_user" flag as we have more than two user types now. I guess "ldap_user" field will remain on its place at lest for some time to provide backward compatibility.