Additionally, Bart wrote:
Best I can recommend would be http://validator.w3.org/checklink. Doubt
it's ideal but it's better than nothing. I did a quick scan and set it
off with a recursion depth of 3 and in a few minutes it had picked up 30
404s. I stopped it then because I didn't have time to run a full scan
but this quick test leads me to believe that the tool should do the trick.
Wendy Smoak added a comment - 07/Aug/06 05:53 PM Additionally, Bart wrote:
Best I can recommend would be http://validator.w3.org/checklink. Doubt
it's ideal but it's better than nothing. I did a quick scan and set it
off with a recursion depth of 3 and in a few minutes it had picked up 30
404s. I stopped it then because I didn't have time to run a full scan
but this quick test leads me to believe that the tool should do the trick.
Discussion thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40struts.apache.org/msg49363.html
Bug
Closed
Minor
Broken Link in User Guide
Best I can recommend would be http://validator.w3.org/checklink. Doubt
it's ideal but it's better than nothing. I did a quick scan and set it
off with a recursion depth of 3 and in a few minutes it had picked up 30
404s. I stopped it then because I didn't have time to run a full scan
but this quick test leads me to believe that the tool should do the trick.
Discussion thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40struts.apache.org/msg49363.html