
| Key: |
XMLRPC-60
|
| Type: |
Bug
|
| Status: |
Closed
|
| Resolution: |
Won't Fix
|
| Priority: |
Critical
|
| Assignee: |
Unassigned
|
| Reporter: |
elharo
|
| Votes: |
0
|
| Watchers: |
0
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
| Resolution Date: |
01/Jun/05 06:22 AM
|
|
MinML is not an XML parser, It does not correctly implement the XML specification in a variety of ways. It should not be bundled and should not be used. Given that Java 1.4 now includes a much more conformant parser (and Java 1.5 includes an even better one) there's no excuse for distributing a non-conformant parser like MinML. XML-RPC is XML, and nothing less than a real XML parser can handle it correctly.
|
|
Description
|
MinML is not an XML parser, It does not correctly implement the XML specification in a variety of ways. It should not be bundled and should not be used. Given that Java 1.4 now includes a much more conformant parser (and Java 1.5 includes an even better one) there's no excuse for distributing a non-conformant parser like MinML. XML-RPC is XML, and nothing less than a real XML parser can handle it correctly. |
Show » |
|
Might I suggest that the way to procede is to describe some concrete instances of MinML's failure in the role, and if possible provide some simple reproducable test cases to support your opinion.
Might I also point out: "http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/parser.html" which describes how to use any other parser.
I would respectfully suggest this issue be downgraded to "Minor" "Wish" and resolve by changing the _default_ parser to the J2SE default.