|
Marc Prud'hommeaux made changes - 24/Mar/07 04:11 AM
Marc Prud'hommeaux made changes - 24/Mar/07 04:47 AM
I like it.
What if the type is not one of the expected types? Perhaps we want to identify this case? Such as "unexpected error" or something. It looks like we just use type + " error" if the type isn't recognized.
+1 as it is, but I'm not opposed to changing type + " error" to "unexpected error" or something similar.
Marc Prud'hommeaux made changes - 24/Mar/07 07:38 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Any objections?