|
[
Permlink
| « Hide
]
Grant Ingersoll added a comment - 13/Jan/08 03:09 PM
This seems reasonable, although I am not an expert in low-level file system calls like this. I guess for me the thing would be to find out if the major filesystems support it (Windows, OSX, Linux) and then perhaps we can deal w/ others from there as they arise (i.e. those that don't support it)
OK I'll test on the major platforms, and take that approach. I'll tentatively target 2.4.
Michael McCandless made changes - 14/Jan/08 03:38 PM
Attached patch. All tests pass on OS X 10.4, Linux 2.6.22, Windows
Server 2003. I plan to commit in a day or two.
Michael McCandless made changes - 21/Jan/08 11:06 AM
I just committed this.
Michael McCandless made changes - 25/Jan/08 09:42 AM
Didn't find time to comment on this earlier.
Does this mean one will no longer be able to tell exactly how large the index really is (because some portion of some data files will actually be empty)?
Only while the CFS is being built. After it's done being built, then
Michael McCandless made changes - 11/Oct/08 12:49 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||