
| Key: |
JS2-251
|
| Type: |
Improvement
|
| Status: |
Closed
|
| Resolution: |
Duplicate
|
| Priority: |
Major
|
| Assignee: |
Unassigned
|
| Reporter: |
Sebastian Komander
|
| Votes: |
0
|
| Watchers: |
1
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
| Resolution Date: |
13/Nov/05 06:04 AM
|
|
Hi,
actually, the navigation structure is layed out to the filesystem (WEB-INF/pages).
Have you ever thought about saving the navigation into the database.
I thought about the following:
- There is no difference between a page and folder, the are "categories"
- A page can contain portlets and also a new categorie
It's like a tree
Top-Navigation
|
----------
| |
Cat1 Cat2
|
Cat3
and so on..
So there a Top-Level-Navigation (actually the "Tab"-Navigation). There are only "Cat1" and "Cat2" shown. The other categories are shown in a drop down menu.
On my opinion, this opens much features, which are lost if using the file-system.
How do you think about this ?
Best regards,
Sebastian
|
|
Description
|
Hi,
actually, the navigation structure is layed out to the filesystem (WEB-INF/pages).
Have you ever thought about saving the navigation into the database.
I thought about the following:
- There is no difference between a page and folder, the are "categories"
- A page can contain portlets and also a new categorie
It's like a tree
Top-Navigation
|
----------
| |
Cat1 Cat2
|
Cat3
and so on..
So there a Top-Level-Navigation (actually the "Tab"-Navigation). There are only "Cat1" and "Cat2" shown. The other categories are shown in a drop down menu.
On my opinion, this opens much features, which are lost if using the file-system.
How do you think about this ?
Best regards,
Sebastian |
Show » |
made changes - 13/Nov/05 06:04 AM
| Field |
Original Value |
New Value |
|
Resolution
|
|
Duplicate
[ 3
]
|
|
Fix Version/s
|
|
2.0-FINAL
[ 10940
]
|
|
Status
|
Open
[ 1
]
|
Closed
[ 6
]
|
|