| Key: |
JS1-267
|
| Type: |
Bug
|
| Status: |
Resolved
|
| Resolution: |
Fixed
|
| Assignee: |
Unassigned
|
| Reporter: |
Sami Leino
|
| Votes: |
0
|
| Watchers: |
0
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
|
File Attachments:
|
|
|
Environment:
|
Operating System: All
Platform: All
Operating System: All
Platform: All
|
|
| Bugzilla Id: |
18694
|
| Resolution Date: |
14/May/04 12:16 AM
|
|
I created this bug entry because the attachment in Daniel Twadell's
posting 'LDAP Schema violation using OpenLDAP 2.1.12' did not get through the
mailing list for some reason. Here's what Daniel wrote:
> implementing the LDAP schema using openLDAP 2.1.12
> and after adding the jetspeed.schema, openldap complains about the about
> the matching syntax of the usergrouprole attribute
>
> /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/jetspeed.schema: line 37: AttributeType
> inappropriate matching rule: "caseIgnoreIA5Match"
>
> I changed the SYNTAX on line 36 in the jetspeed.schema to
> SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26
> and openldap is fine....
I changed the syntax to the value Daniel suggested, and wrote slightly better
descriptions for the attributes. I configured my OpenLDAP build to use the new
schema, and imported test data to validate that nothing got broken. The
modified schema should therefore be valid, although my OpenLDAP build does not
unfortunately warn me about minor schema violations.
|
|
Description
|
I created this bug entry because the attachment in Daniel Twadell's
posting 'LDAP Schema violation using OpenLDAP 2.1.12' did not get through the
mailing list for some reason. Here's what Daniel wrote:
> implementing the LDAP schema using openLDAP 2.1.12
> and after adding the jetspeed.schema, openldap complains about the about
> the matching syntax of the usergrouprole attribute
>
> /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/jetspeed.schema: line 37: AttributeType
> inappropriate matching rule: "caseIgnoreIA5Match"
>
> I changed the SYNTAX on line 36 in the jetspeed.schema to
> SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26
> and openldap is fine....
I changed the syntax to the value Daniel suggested, and wrote slightly better
descriptions for the attributes. I configured my OpenLDAP build to use the new
schema, and imported test data to validate that nothing got broken. The
modified schema should therefore be valid, although my OpenLDAP build does not
unfortunately warn me about minor schema violations. |
Show » |
| There are no subversion log entries for this issue yet.
|
|
[PATCH] Schema violation on OpenLDAP 2.1.12
