|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
| Resolution Date: |
09/Oct/06 10:43 PM
|
|
In StateTransitions.java, a couple of the transition assertions that are made in the "detachCopy with active tx" scenario are not documented:
Element 4 (0-based) asserts that HOLLOW will remain UNCHANGED when detachCopy() is called on them. However, this doesn't seem to be anywhere in the spec, and also doesn't seem right, since a hollow instance would need to instantiate its fields in order to cascade the detach operation (subject to the setting of the DETACH_LOAD_FIELDS setting).
Element 9 asserts that a PERSISTENT_NONTRANSACTIONAL instance will remain unchanged. However, for the same reason as above, it might transition to persistent-clean due to reading a field.
|
|
Description
|
In StateTransitions.java, a couple of the transition assertions that are made in the "detachCopy with active tx" scenario are not documented:
Element 4 (0-based) asserts that HOLLOW will remain UNCHANGED when detachCopy() is called on them. However, this doesn't seem to be anywhere in the spec, and also doesn't seem right, since a hollow instance would need to instantiate its fields in order to cascade the detach operation (subject to the setting of the DETACH_LOAD_FIELDS setting).
Element 9 asserts that a PERSISTENT_NONTRANSACTIONAL instance will remain unchanged. However, for the same reason as above, it might transition to persistent-clean due to reading a field.
|
Show » |
|
Bug
Resolved
Major
StateTransitions makes undocumented assertions in detachCopy with active tx
