|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
| Resolution Date: |
04/Oct/06 08:37 PM
|
|
In page 124: "A value of -1 means that the recursion-depth is not limited by traversing this field."
In page 127: "A recursion-depth of 0 will fetch the whole graph of instances reachable from this field"
Is there a difference between these two?
In addition, I think that -1 / 0 as a default might be better than 1 it terms of performance, because tracking such cycles has some overhead, which we might not want to pay for most fields in which this feature is not needed (and MaxFetchDepth is sufficient).
|
|
Description
|
In page 124: "A value of -1 means that the recursion-depth is not limited by traversing this field."
In page 127: "A recursion-depth of 0 will fetch the whole graph of instances reachable from this field"
Is there a difference between these two?
In addition, I think that -1 / 0 as a default might be better than 1 it terms of performance, because tracking such cycles has some overhead, which we might not want to pay for most fields in which this feature is not needed (and MaxFetchDepth is sufficient). |
Show » |
| No work has yet been logged on this issue.
|
|
Bug
Resolved
Major
recursion-depth - fetching the whole graph with 0 or -1?
