Updated license header in java files, added asl2 header to xdoc, pom, build files.
Updated NOTICE to include references to all of the distributed libraries (JAMES-579)
Stefano Bagnara added a comment - 27/Jul/06 10:12 AM Updated the license headers.
Updated the NOTICE.
Maybe we also need to add a LICENSE file for each library mentioned in the NOTICE.
Added a libraryname.LICENSE file for every non ASF library included in the repository (JAMES-579)
Cliff should confirm if this is the rigth place of if we have to move them to the root of the project and we should make sure this LICENSE files are bundled in the final distribution. (JAMES-582)
1. run-unit-tests now halts on error
2. Legal licensing issues (JAMES-579)
a. Created a README.txt including crypto notice
b. added required sentences (by 3rd party licenses) to NOTICE.txt
c. added 3rd party LICENSEs links to LICENSE.txt
d. Included README/NOTICE/LICENSE txt files in binary/sources redistributable packages (rel JAMES-582)
I think I committed everything we need into trunk.
r427649 and r429311 should be verified and backported to 2.3
I have a doubt about Javamail/JAF licenses: the http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/ homepage links to glassfish project that reference the CDDL license, but the downloadable artifacts include a different LICENSE file. Currently I have copied the LICENSE files from the downloadable artifact to <name>.LICENSE in the lib folder but I linked the CDDL url in the bottom of our main LICENSE txt file.
Not sure what is the right thing to do. AFAIK Sun made id public that these artifacts are now CDDL but they included the old license in the artifacts...
Stefano Bagnara added a comment - 07/Aug/06 12:11 PM I think I committed everything we need into trunk.
r427649 and r429311 should be verified and backported to 2.3
I have a doubt about Javamail/JAF licenses: the http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/ homepage links to glassfish project that reference the CDDL license, but the downloadable artifacts include a different LICENSE file. Currently I have copied the LICENSE files from the downloadable artifact to <name>.LICENSE in the lib folder but I linked the CDDL url in the bottom of our main LICENSE txt file.
Not sure what is the right thing to do. AFAIK Sun made id public that these artifacts are now CDDL but they included the old license in the artifacts...
Bug
Closed
Major
Update license headers and NOTICE to follow the latest ASF requirements
Updated the NOTICE.
Maybe we also need to add a LICENSE file for each library mentioned in the NOTICE.