|
May someone check if this license would allow distribution with Forrest?
Johannes Schaefer made changes - 11/Feb/06 01:59 AM
The current licence only states that the license-wrapper.txt be included somewhere obvious, otherwise no restrictions.
I guess it's worth checking with legal@ unless someone can confirm it is ok without doing that. There is also a later version of the wrapper since this issue was opened. The license does not say "somewhere obvious", so just doing our normal license placement and naming is fine.
Sorry that i didn't answer Gav's 23/Jun/07 comment. We can determine easy ones like this by ourselves. See legal-discuss@ yesterday: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200710.mbox/%3c005f01c80ebb$ab0b5920$0200a8c0@developer%3e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/forrest-user/200601.mbox/%3c43DF9E5A.7080609@uidesign.de%3e
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/forrest-user/200601.mbox/%3cB07F6610DABEA8438092ED2058D7F1668A1DBF@z011134.bk.fin.local%3e