XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Blocker
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 1.0.1, 1.5.0
    • None
    • None
    • windows xp

    Description

      Hi,

      I understand that "LDAP directories use the concept of object classes to
      define which attributes are allowed for objects of any given type"
      consequently , I would like to know if the following behavior is normal:

      in ApacheDS I am able to make use of any attribute without having added
      the object classes which provide these attributes.

      Illustration

      say I have an entry uid=kevin, ou=users,ou=sample
      kevin has the following attributes cn=kevin spacey, dc=ke, objectclass=top

      Is it normal for apacheDS to allow me add cn and dc attributes even
      though I havent added the object classes Person and domain ?

      Please start a new thread when you change the topic.

      Schema checking should prevent this if it is enabled and by default it
      is in ApacheDS. If it's not doing that then we have a bug.

      here is the code

      public class CreateSubcontext {

      /**

      • @param args
        */
        public static void main(String[] args)
        {
        try
        { //use properties file to set connection InputStream inputStream = new FileInputStream( "apacheds.properties"); Properties properties = new Properties(); properties.load(inputStream); //create context DirContext ctx=new InitialDirContext(properties); //mould entry Attributes attrs=new BasicAttributes(true); Attribute obj=new BasicAttribute("ObjectClass", "top"); Attribute ob = new BasicAttribute("cn", "kevin Spacey"); Attribute ob1 = new BasicAttribute("dc", "ke"); attrs.put(obj); attrs.put(ob); attrs.put(ob1); String rdns="uid=kevin"; //create subcontext DirContext result=ctx.createSubcontext(rdns, attrs); result.close(); }

        catch(Exception e)

        { System.out.println(e); }

        }

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            elecharny Emmanuel Lécharny
            tenjohokwen mbah tenjoh-okwen
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: