[#DIRMINA-156] Name of threads created for Service ThreadPoolFilter aren't very revelant

MINA

Name of threads created for Service ThreadPoolFilter aren't very revelant

Created: 29/Dec/05 09:21 PM Updated: 26/May/09 12:48 AM

Return to search

Component/s:

None

Affects Version/s:

0.9.0

Fix Version/s:

0.9.3

Time Tracking:

Not Specified

Environment:

MINA 0.9, looking at Thread list of a MINA server using jconsole

Resolution Date:

12/Mar/06 05:40 PM

Description

« Hide

all the threads created by the ThreadPoolFilters, added to Services by the SimpleServiceRegistry got the name "PoolThreadXXX".
a prefix with the service name whould be usefull for debuging or reading logs

All

Comments

Work Log

Change History

Subversion Commits

Sort Order:

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Trustin Lee added a comment - 29/Dec/05 09:37 PM

The built-in thread pool in SimpleServiceRegistry is shared by multiple services, so we cannot set the service name. Of course we can call Thread.setName(String) whenever we process new session, but it will be quite expensive.

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Julien Vermillard added a comment - 29/Dec/05 09:51 PM

a ThreadPool per service won't make sense ? so you can control threading per service ?

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Trustin Lee added a comment - 03/Jan/06 05:42 PM

if you need more control over therad model, then you'd better use IoAcceptor directly IMHO. ServiceRegistry might be removed before we release 1.0 because we'll simplify the API so we don't need any frontend API anymore, so it makes sense considering current situation.

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Trustin Lee added a comment - 26/Feb/06 09:30 AM

Will fix this in 0.9.3.

[ Permlink | « Hide ]

Trustin Lee added a comment - 12/Mar/06 05:40 PM

~~DIRMINA-190~~ resolves this issue. Please specify your own thread model like an example.