|
The changes look good to me.
One question: Do you consider the example to belong under "Implementation-defined aspects", or can that heading/section be removed now that the misleading statement has been removed. Thanks, Kristian. I was wondering about that heading myself -- I think it may make sense to just call it "Example" instead, unless it really does show implementation-specific behavior. However, that seems unlikely. I'll file a revised patch.
Attaching a revised patch,
I think the revised patch looks better.
+1 to commit Thanks, Kim! Thank you, Kim!
I confirmed the change in all three variants of the reference manual. Closing the issue. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DERBY-4025.diff and rrefsqlj13733.html, which add the limit of 254 characters to the syntax information and remove the misleading statement near the end. Hope this does the job.