Description
I'm currently extending the KerberosAuthenticator, since SecurityOperation depends on it for a few checks (see uses of SecurityOperation#isKerberos). I relied on KerberosAuthenticator#initializeSecurity to create the root user's ZooKeeper entry for me. When the KerberosAuthenticator creates principals, it base64 encodes them. This causes the root entry under /accumulo/instance/users to also be base64 encoded.
In a few spots, SecurityOperation will try to short circuit things by checking if the user has the root user name. This will fail because the principal will be in plain-form (ie, root@EXAMPLE.COM), and the data from ZooKeeper is base-64 encoded.
This opens up a security hole where the root user can have its permissions altered. I had a small test where I created a new user, gave it SystemPermission.GRANT, then revoked the root user's ability to create a table (this is explicitly disallowed in SecurityOperation#canRevokeSystem).
Test:
"Accumulo" should "revoke app2's attempt to modify the root user" in { val root = UserGroupInformation.loginUserFromKeytabAndReturnUGI("root@EXAMPLE.COM", kdc.getRootUser.getKeytab.getAbsolutePath) val con = accumulo.getConnector(root.getUserName, new KerberosToken) con.securityOperations.grantSystemPermission(app1.getUserName, SystemPermission.GRANT) doAs(app1, () => { val con = accumulo.getConnector(app1.getUserName, new KerberosToken) con.securityOperations.revokeSystemPermission(root.getUserName, SystemPermission.CREATE_TABLE) }) // this will now throw an error con.tableOperations.create("hopefully_I_can_create_ this") }
Output:
- should revoke app2's attempt to modify the root user *** FAILED *** org.apache.accumulo.core.client.AccumuloSecurityException: Error PERMISSION_DENIED for user root@EXAMPLE.COM on table hopefully_I_can_create_this(?) - User does not have permission to perform this action at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.doFateOperation(TableOperationsImpl.java:285) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.doFateOperation(TableOperationsImpl.java:261) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.doTableFateOperation(TableOperationsImpl.java:1427) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.create(TableOperationsImpl.java:188) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.create(TableOperationsImpl.java:155) at KerbSpec$$anonfun$8.apply$mcV$sp(ServerTest.scala:131) at KerbSpec$$anonfun$8.apply(ServerTest.scala:122) at KerbSpec$$anonfun$8.apply(ServerTest.scala:122) at org.scalatest.Transformer$$anonfun$apply$1.apply$mcV$sp(Transformer.scala:22) at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$class.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:85) ... Cause: org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.thrift.ThriftSecurityException: at org.apache.accumulo.core.master.thrift.FateService$executeFateOperation_result$executeFateOperation_resultStandardScheme.read(FateService.java:3129) at org.apache.accumulo.core.master.thrift.FateService$executeFateOperation_result$executeFateOperation_resultStandardScheme.read(FateService.java:3115) at org.apache.accumulo.core.master.thrift.FateService$executeFateOperation_result.read(FateService.java:3057) at org.apache.thrift.TServiceClient.receiveBase(TServiceClient.java:78) at org.apache.accumulo.core.master.thrift.FateService$Client.recv_executeFateOperation(FateService.java:146) at org.apache.accumulo.core.master.thrift.FateService$Client.executeFateOperation(FateService.java:127) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.executeFateOperation(TableOperationsImpl.java:217) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.doFateOperation(TableOperationsImpl.java:270) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.doFateOperation(TableOperationsImpl.java:261) at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.TableOperationsImpl.doTableFateOperation(TableOperationsImpl.java:1427) ...
I'm reasonably certain the that the fix is to just have the KerberosAuthenticator not base64 encode the root principal when initializeSecurity is called.