Details
-
Sub-task
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
Description
Given that recovering from a failed namenode in 1.6 could be tricky (see ACCUMULO-1832). I think we should recommend using viewfs:// or HA namenodes in documentation. Using either of these approaches, there would be no need to rewrite uris in Accumulo. Only hadoop config would need to be changed if the namenode is moved.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
ACCUMULO-2047 Failures when using two namenodes and viewfs://
- Resolved