Bug 18292 - 24 bit PNG not displayed correctly
Summary: 24 bit PNG not displayed correctly
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Fop - Now in Jira
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pdf (show other bugs)
Version: 0.94
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: fop-dev
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-03-24 21:01 UTC by Michael Valeiko
Modified: 2012-04-30 00:19 UTC (History)
0 users



Attachments
test file to display 24-bit png (1.47 KB, text/plain)
2003-04-11 15:10 UTC, Michael Valeiko
Details
24-bit image used in test file (14.73 KB, image/png)
2003-04-11 15:11 UTC, Michael Valeiko
Details
Output of test24bitpng.fo (12.50 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-04-11 15:12 UTC, Michael Valeiko
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Valeiko 2003-03-24 21:01:52 UTC
When inserting a 24-bit .PNG file into a pdf, the transpancy is displayed a 
black. 8-bit .png files display correctly.
Comment 1 Christian Geisert 2003-03-25 02:01:43 UTC
I'm guessing that you're using Jimi for the PNG images (as FOP 0.20.4 isn't
compiled with JAI support)
Please try FOP 0.20.5rc2 with JAI
Comment 2 Michael Valeiko 2003-03-25 20:36:04 UTC
I am using 20.4 with JAI.
Comment 3 Christian Geisert 2003-04-10 15:25:13 UTC
Does it work with Jimi?
Please add a testcase as attachment to this bug if possible.
Comment 4 Michael Valeiko 2003-04-11 15:10:49 UTC
Created attachment 5801 [details]
test file to display 24-bit png
Comment 5 Michael Valeiko 2003-04-11 15:11:45 UTC
Created attachment 5802 [details]
24-bit image used in test file
Comment 6 Michael Valeiko 2003-04-11 15:12:45 UTC
Created attachment 5803 [details]
Output of test24bitpng.fo
Comment 7 Michael Valeiko 2003-04-11 15:13:43 UTC
I have not tried it with jimi since we are already shipping jai.

-Mike
Comment 8 Pascal Sancho 2007-10-23 08:11:25 UTC
Works for PDF output, but confirmed in FOP 0.94 on AWT output
Comment 9 Luis Bernardo 2012-04-14 00:42:27 UTC
works for AWT too. I think this can be closed.
Comment 10 Glenn Adams 2012-04-14 04:06:24 UTC
no longer reproducible according to comment 8 and 9
Comment 11 Glenn Adams 2012-04-30 00:19:38 UTC
batch transition resolved+worksforme to closed+worksforme; if you believe this
remains a bug and can demonstrate it with appropriate input FO file and output
PDF file (as applicable), then you may reopen